From similar topics
to supported relationships.
Assess whether a connection is useful. Record what the papers actually say before proposing scientific continuation.
Entries are saved only in this browser, when storage is available. They are not submitted to ICCC, shared with other visitors or applied to the public map. Export your review to keep or share it.
Read both papers
Use the source links. Shared title words suggest a relationship; they do not establish one.
Identify the relationship
A citation, method reuse, a practical test and a genuine extension are different findings.
Attach evidence
Record a source URL, page or section and a short excerpt or explanation. An assessment remains a reviewer proposal.
Phase estimation & Kalman filtering
Reviewer names are self-entered and not identity-verified. A useful connection does not automatically mean research continuation. Red map arrows are navigation aids.
Missing links & practical value
Record up to three known examples of genuine continuation, or explain a useful student task. Include paper titles or DOIs and the supporting source.